Tue, Aug 8, 2017 03:43 AM
I have not blogged in over a year. Shame on me. I think part of the reason was because my blog template had become quite dated. I tweaked it a bit to make it semi-responsive a while back. But, I have never been happy with it.
So, I decided to build a new, mobile first template from scratch and use lots of modern (relative to my old template) CSS and responsive web design techniques. Things like rem for sizing things, flexbox, text-shadow, and background-size (for the header image). I know it is nothing ground-breaking. And, at the same time, it was nice to shed all the old compatibility layers and work with the code without worrying about fall backs.
For the font, I chose the super-popular Open Sans after reading "Serif or Sans Serif?" by Danielle Stone. I looked at many sans serif fonts. Open Sans just looked the cleanest to me.
I opted to go with an easy to read black text on white background after reading "How the Web Became Unreadable" by Kevin Marks. One great nugget in that article is where Kevin quotes Adam Schwartz:
A color is a color isn’t a color……not to computers…and not to the human eye.I found this very interesting. I often look at my "black" SUV and think "my car looks kind of brown today".
With the help of the love of my life, Deedra, I found the header graphic, bought it from iStockPhoto and then played with the hue a bit to get it just right.
While testing, I found myself reading my old blog posts. It felt good. I really need to do this more.
Mon, Mar 28, 2011 08:00 AM
I was looking through dealnews.com browser stats the other day to see how many of our visitors had browsers that could use CSS3. This was how it broke down.
58% of dealnews visitors have browsers that support some CSS3 elements like border-radius and box-shadow. This includes recent Webkit, Firefox 3.5+, Opera 10+ and IE9. Awesome! Another 37% fully support CSS2. This includes IE7, IE8 and Firefox 2 - 3.0.x.
We have started to sneak in some CSS3 elements into the CSS on dealnews.com. In places where rounded corners are optional (like the lightbox
I created), we use border-radius instead of a lot of images. The same
for shadows. We have started using box-shadow instead of, well, nothing.
We just don't have shadows if the browser does not support box-shadow.
In our recent redesign of our mobile site, we used all CSS3 for shadows,
corners and gradients. But these were all places where things were
The header of dealnews.com, on the other hand, requires a certain consistency. It
is the first thing you see. If it looks largely different on your work
computer running IE7 than it does on your Mac at home using Safari, that may be
confusing. So, we have stuck with images for rounded
corners, shadows and gradients. The images have problems though. On the iPad for
instance, the page starts zoomed out a bit. The elements holding the
rounded corner images don't always line up well at different zoom
levels. Its a math thing. When zooming, you end up with an odd number of
pixels at times which causes pixels to shift. So, we get gaps in our
tabs or buttons. Not pretty. This has been bugging me, but its really
just the iPad. Its not mission critical to fix a pixel on the iPad. Armed with the numbers above, I decided to try and reproduce the dealnews.com header using the most modern techniques possible and see how well I could degrade the older browsers.
Here is a screen shot in Firefox 4 of the current dealnews header. (You can click any of these images to see them full size.)
Now, here is the HTML5/CSS3 header in all the browsers I tried it in. I developed in Firefox 4 and tested/tweaked in others.
Firefox 4 (Mac)
Firefox 3.6 (Windows)
Internet Explorer 9
Internet Explorer 8 (via IE9 Dev Tools)
Internet Explorer 7 (via IE9 Dev Tools)
Internet Explorer 6 (ZOMG!!1!)
Wow! This turned out way better than I expected. Even IE6 renders nicely. I did have to degrade in some older versions of Internet Explorer. This gets me 97% coverage for all the dealnews.com visitors. And, IMO, degrading this way is not all that bad. I am seeing it more and more around the internet. CNET is using border-radius and CSS3 gradients in their header. In Internet Explorer you see square corners and no gradient. Let's look a little deeper into what I used here.
For all the rounded corners, I used a border-radius of 5px. I used CSS that would be most compatible. For border-radius that means a few lines just to get the one effect across browsers. The CSS for the tabs looks like this.
The -moz is to support Firefox 3.5+. Everything else that supports border-radius recognizes the non-prefixed style.
For the older browsers, they just use square corners. I think they still look nice. The one thing we lose with this solution is the styled gradient border on the brown tabs. It fades to a silver near the bottom of the tabs. There is no solution for that in CSS at this time. That is a small price to pay to skip loading all those images IMO.
For the shadows on the left and right side of the page (sorry, not real visible in the screen shots), I used box-shadow. This requires CSS such as:
-webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0 transparent, 0 2px 2px #B2B1A6;
-moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0 transparent, 0 2px 2px #B2B1A6;
box-shadow: 0 0 0 transparent, 0 2px 2px #B2B1A6;
Again, -moz for Mozilla browsers and -webkit for WebKit based browsers. Now, there are some gotchas with box-shadow. The first is that Firefox requires a color. The other supporting browsers will simply use an alpha blended darker gradient. This makes it a little more work to get it all right in Firefox. The other tricky part was getting the vertical shadow to work. The shadow you make actual curves around the entire element. It has the same z-index as the element itself. So, a shadow on an element will appear on top of other elements around it with a lower z-index. I had issues keeping the shadow from the lower area (the vertical shadow) from appearing above the element and on top of the tabs. If you look really, really, really close where the vertical and horizontal shadows meet, you will see a tiny gap in the color. Luckily for me, it works due to all the blue around it. That helps mask that small flaw.
For the older IE browsers, I used conditional IE HTML blocks and added a light gray border to the elements. It is a bit more degraded than I like, but as time passes, those browsers will stop being used.
Completing the holy trinity of CSS3 features that make life easier is gradient backgrounds. This is the least unified and most complex of the three features I have used in this experiement. For starters, no two browser use the same syntax for gradient backgrounds. Firefox does use the W3C recommended syntax. Webkit uses something they came up with and Internet Explorer uses its super proprietary filter CSS property and not the background property. The biggest problem with the filter property is that it makes IE9 not work with border-radius. The tabs could not use a gradient in IE9 because it applied a rectangular gradient to the element that exceeded the bounds of the rounded top corners. Bummer. Once the standard is set this should all clear itself up. As things stand today, I had to use the following syntax for the shadows.
background: #4b4ba8; /* old browsers */
background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #4b4ba8 0%, #3F3F9A 50%, #303089 93%); /* firefox */
background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, color-stop(0%,#4b4ba8), color-stop(50%,#3F3F9A), color-stop(93%,#303089)); /* webkit */
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient( startColorstr='#4b4ba8', endColorstr='#303089',GradientType=0 ); /* ie */
As you can see, this is pretty complex. See the next section for a quick way to configure that block of CSS.
Another thing that makes working with these gradients more complex than images is a lack of rendering control. When you are making images, you can control the exact RGB values of the colors in the images. When you leave it up to the browser to render the gradient, sometimes they don't agree. I had to do a lot of fiddling with the RGB values to get all the browsers to render the gradient just right. Some of this had to do with the short vertical area I am using in the elements. That limits the number of colors that can be used to make the transition. So, just be careful when you are lining up two elements with gradients that transition from one element to the other like I have here with the blue tab and the blue navigation bar.
CSS3 Online tools
Remembering all the CSS3 syntax is a little daunting. Luckily, there are some cool online tools to generate some of this stuff. Here are few I have used.
To make this truly an HTML5 page, I wanted to use the new doctype and some of the new elements. I make use of the <header> and <nav> tags in this page. The <header> tag is just what you would think it is. It surrounds your header. This is all part of the new semantic logic behind HTML 5. The <nav> tag surrounds major site navigation. Not just any navigaion, major navigation. The HTML5 Doctor has more on that.
A couple of non-CSS3 techniques
I did a couple of things that are not CSS3 or HTML5 in this page. One is that I put the CSS into the page and not in its own file. With modern broadband, the biggest issue in delivering pages fast is the
number of HTTP requests, not (always) the total size of the data. The
more HTTP requests required to start rendering your page, the longer it
will take. Your optimization goals will determine if this technique is right for you. I currently include all CSS needed to render the header in the page so that the rendering can start without any additional HTTP requests. The CSS for the rest of the page is included via a link tag.
The other technique I used in this page that is not new, but is not widely used. Again, depending on your needs, it may be a possible win when trying to reduce HTTP requests. I used embedded image data URIs in the CSS for the three images I still needed for this page. Basically, you base64 encode the actual image file and put it into the CSS. The benefit is that this page is fully rendered with just one HTTP request. The downside is that the base size for the page (or CSS if it is external) that has to be downloaded every time is much larger. Probably a good compromise would be to put the CSS into an external file. This would mean just two HTTP requests would be needed and the CSS could be cached. For IE6, I just used conditional HTML to include an actual URL to the background images.
Th data URI technique is a little bit of a mysterious technique in that it does make for a larger page, but can help with render time on first load. This really comes down to what you are optimizing for. If you are optimizing for repeat visitors, it may be that the images are better off being separate requests. If you are optimizing for new visitors, this technique will yield a faster rendering page. In Chrome and IE9, the onLoad event fired much sooner (as much as half the time) using this technique than having the images as a separate reqeust. In Firefox, something else is going on. I am not sure what. The onLoad event still fires sooner, but not a whole lot sooner. The DOMContentLoaded event in Firefox however fires later with this technique than with the images in a separate request. Firefox was the only browser that showed this pattern.
It is not really HTML5 or CSS3 related, but I do want to give some credit to OOCSS. I used it for much of the layout. It makes laying out elements in different browsers very easy. I am using it in the current site as well as the HTML5 experiment. You should use it. It is awesome.
HTML5 and CSS3 have a lot to offer. And if you have a user base that is fairly modern, you can start using things now. While I may not redo the current dealnews web site using HTML5 and CSS3, our next redesign and any upcoming new designs will definitely include aspects of HTML5 and CSS3 where we can. It can save time and resources when you use these new techniques.
Here is a link to the HTML5 source. I also created a stripped down version of the HTML4 in use on the site now.
Fri, Oct 9, 2009 03:52 PM
YUI has a built in carousel widget.
However, it requires fixed widths for all the parts. That does not
fit well in a liquid CSS layout. In particular, we have to support
people using large fonts at the OS level and large font settings in
their browsers. I did not want for our carousel to break down in
these cases. The built in YUI widget does. See this
normal sized screen shot versus one with
large fonts. Now look at dealnews with normal fonts and
So, I decided to make my own using YUI and the grid CSS from
Object-Oriented CSS. You can
see my working example with some explination here.